Skip to content
Robot PoolCleaner Picks

Hayward TigerShark QC Review (2026) — Who It's Actually For

The TigerShark with a Quick Clean cycle, rated for a 20 x 40 ft pool — the Hayward robot to buy, and still priced above what the coverage justifies.

By Mike M. · Published November 6, 2026 · Last updated November 6, 2026

How this page is funded: we earn an Amazon commission on qualifying purchases made through links here, at no extra cost to you. It does not change which products we pick or the order we rank them in — here is the method and the full disclosure. Prices are live from Amazon, checked November 6, 2026.

The Hayward TigerShark QC is the Hayward robot worth buying: a published 20 x 40 ft rating and a Quick Clean cycle for a fast pre-guests pass. At around $1,489 it is flagship money for a machine that does not skim, map or publish a micron figure.

At a glance

Quick picks

Tap any row for the full write-up. Prices are live from Amazon, checked November 6, 2026.

#ProductBest forScorePrice
1
Hayward TigerShark QC

Hayward TigerShark QC

Hayward · W3RC9990CUB

Best for Hayward equipment owners7.2out of 10
$1,489.00· View on Amazon

Price checked November 6, 2026. #ad How we earn

2
Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme

Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme

Dolphin · Corded, mains power supply

50 ft rated with a dedicated waterline brush, for about $40 less8.6out of 10
$1,449.00· View on Amazon

Price checked November 6, 2026. #ad How we earn

3
Beatbot Sora 70

Beatbot Sora 70

Beatbot · 6,800 GPH

the same money and it skims the surface as well as cleaning the floor8.6out of 10
$1,499.00· View on Amazon

Price checked November 6, 2026. #ad How we earn

4
Aiper Obsidian

Aiper Obsidian

Aiper · 6,600 GPH

3-micron filtration, 180 minutes and a dock for roughly half the price8.9out of 10
$799.98$1,399.99· View on Amazon

43% off. Price checked November 6, 2026. #ad How we earn

What actually decides this

If you are buying Hayward, buy this one rather than the SharkVac. It publishes the specification the SharkVac withholds and adds the one feature in the Hayward range that is genuinely distinctive.

The Quick Clean cycle is more useful than it sounds

Most robots offer one cleaning cycle, measured in hours. The TigerShark QC adds a short cycle designed for a fast pass — the use case being guests arriving in ninety minutes and leaves in the shallow end. In practice this is the feature owners use most, because the full cycle is something you schedule and the short cycle is something you press.

It also matters for debris management: a short cycle with an empty filter removes more than the back half of a long cycle with a full one, which is the central point about running frequency.

A published rating, at last

20 x 40 feet, which is 800 square feet of floor and covers the large majority of residential inground pools. Hayward gives no figure at all for the SharkVac, so this is a meaningful improvement in a buyer’s ability to size the machine to the pool — which is the first gate in the inground roundup and the thing most often got wrong.

Cheap consumables, which is Hayward’s real strength

RCX70101 cartridges are about $21 for four aftermarket, and they cover the SharkVac, TigerShark and AquaVac families. Four cartridges lets you run two and wash two, which is the only practical way to use fine filtration. On running cost Hayward is competitive with Dolphin and dramatically cheaper than Beatbot.

The price is still the problem

At around $1,489 you are in flagship territory. For that money the Beatbot Sora 70 also skims the water’s surface; the Beatbot AquaSense 2 Ultra maps the pool and detects debris; and the Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme covers 50 feet with a dedicated waterline brush for less.

The TigerShark QC publishes no micron rating, does not skim, does not map, has no charging dock and includes no caddy. It is a well-made, well-supported, conventionally capable machine priced as though it were more than that. The Hayward brand guide is honest about where the whole range sits.

So who should buy it

Someone with an all-Hayward pad who wants one dealer relationship for everything, values local warranty service on a heavy machine, and will genuinely use the Quick Clean cycle. For that person it is a sound purchase. For a buyer shopping purely on capability per dollar, it is not the machine.

How we assessed it, and what we did not do

Every figure in the specification table on this page is attributed: to Hayward’s published specifications, to the Amazon listing for this exact model, or marked as not published where neither source gives a figure. The score is derived from those published numbers by the five-metric rubric, which is published in full.

We have not physically tested this machine. We do not run a test pool, we do not own this unit, and nothing on this site claims otherwise. What we do instead is show where every number comes from, say plainly who the machine is wrong for, and refuse to print a figure we cannot source. Where owner reports inform a point, they are described as owner reports — never as our own experience.

Who should skip it

Skip the Hayward TigerShark QC if you have no reason to stay inside the Hayward ecosystem. The Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme covers 50 ft with a waterline brush for less.

That is not a throwaway line. The most expensive mistake in this category is buying a capable machine that is wrong for your pool — and a machine rated below your pool’s area or missing the one capability your debris requires cannot be fixed by any setting.

Alternatives worth considering

  • Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme — 50 ft rated with a dedicated waterline brush, for about $40 less. Read the review
  • Beatbot Sora 70 — the same money and it skims the surface as well as cleaning the floor. Read the review
  • Aiper Obsidian — 3-micron filtration, 180 minutes and a dock for roughly half the price. Read the review

If you are still narrowing down, the selector tool works from your pool type, size, surface and dominant debris, and the Hayward brand guide covers the whole range and where it stops.

The picks in full

Hayward TigerShark QC

Best for Hayward equipment owners

The TigerShark with a Quick Clean cycle, rated for a 20 x 40 ft pool — the Hayward robot to buy, and still priced above what the coverage justifies.

Spec score

7.2/ 10 — derived from published specs, see the rubric
Debris capacity
8.0
Surface coverage
6.5
Filtration
7.5
Runtime & coverage
9.5
Value for spec
5.5

Published specifications

Model codeW3RC9990CUB(retailer listing)
PowerCorded, mains power supply(retailer listing)
Rated pool sizeInground pools up to 20 x 40 ft(retailer listing)
CycleQuick Clean cycle(retailer listing)
Filter ratingNot published as a micron figure(not published)

What works

  • A 90-minute Quick Clean cycle is genuinely useful before guests arrive
  • Published 20 x 40 ft rating, which Hayward does not give for the SharkVac
  • Hayward dealer warranty service
  • Replacement RCX70101 cartridges are cheap and widely stocked

What doesn't

  • Close to $1,500 — flagship money for a machine that does not skim or map
  • No published micron rating
  • Heavier than the cordless alternatives and no caddy included

Who should skip this

Skip this one if you have no reason to stay inside the Hayward ecosystem. The Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme covers 50 ft with a waterline brush for less.

Dolphin Nautilus CC Supreme

50 ft rated with a dedicated waterline brush, for about $40 less

The 50-foot Dolphin with a dedicated waterline scrubber and dual drive — the corded answer for a large pool where a cordless robot would need two charges.

Spec score

8.6/ 10 — derived from published specs, see the rubric
Debris capacity
8.5
Surface coverage
8.5
Filtration
9.0
Runtime & coverage
10.0
Value for spec
7.0

Published specifications

PowerCorded, mains power supply(retailer listing)
Rated pool sizeInground pools up to 50 ft in length(retailer listing)
WaterlineDedicated waterline scrubber brush(retailer listing)
DriveDual drive(retailer listing)
ControlWi-Fi app control(retailer listing)
Filter accessTop-load filter(retailer listing)

What works

  • 50 ft rating covers nearly every residential pool, including long lap pools
  • A dedicated waterline brush, not a wall climb that happens to reach the line
  • No battery, so a long pool never means a mid-cycle recharge
  • Full Maytronics parts support

What doesn't

  • A long cable in a long pool is more cable to manage, not less
  • Costs more than most cordless flagships while skimming nothing
  • Still needs a sited power supply

Who should skip this

Skip this one if your pool is under 40 ft — the Nautilus CC Plus does the same job for roughly $550 less.

Beatbot Sora 70

the same money and it skims the surface as well as cleaning the floor

The only machine here that skims the surface and cleans the floor in the same cycle without being a $2,300 flagship — the right answer for a pool under heavy tree cover.

Spec score

8.6/ 10 — derived from published specs, see the rubric
Debris capacity
9.0
Surface coverage
10.0
Filtration
6.5
Runtime & coverage
8.5
Value for spec
7.5

Published specifications

Suction6,800 GPH(retailer listing)
Battery10,000 mAh(retailer listing)
CoverageFloor, walls, waterline, surface and platform(retailer listing)
Surface cleaningJetPulse surface cleaning(retailer listing)
RetrievalAuto parking and tap-to-retrieve(retailer listing)
Filter ratingNot stated on this listing(not published)

What works

  • Surface plus submerged cleaning in one unit, for roughly $800 less than the AquaSense 2 Ultra
  • Catching leaves at the surface stops them sinking and staining — it is the single highest-leverage feature for a tree-shaded pool
  • Full five-surface coverage including platforms
  • Tap-to-retrieve, so a 25 lb robot is never a swim away

What doesn't

  • No published micron rating
  • A machine doing two jobs splits its runtime between them
  • At $1,499 it is competing with corded Dolphins that never need charging

Who should skip this

Skip this one if you have no overhanging trees. Without a surface debris problem, the Sora 30 does the submerged work for half the price.

Aiper Obsidian

3-micron filtration, 180 minutes and a dock for roughly half the price

6,600 GPH, 3-micron MicroMesh filtration, a charging dock and 180 minutes — the spec sheet of a flagship at the price of a mid-range unit, and the best value on this site when the discount holds.

Spec score

8.9/ 10 — derived from published specs, see the rubric
Debris capacity
8.0
Surface coverage
8.5
Filtration
10.0
Runtime & coverage
8.5
Value for spec
9.5

Published specifications

Suction6,600 GPH(retailer listing)
Filter rating3 micron MicroMesh(retailer listing)
PowerCordless, 180-minute rated runtime(retailer listing)
ChargingWireless charging dock(retailer listing)
Surfaces cleanedFloor, walls and waterline(retailer listing)
Pool typeInground(retailer listing)

What works

  • 3-micron filtration plus 6,600 GPH is flagship-tier on paper
  • Full floor-wall-waterline coverage, not floor-and-walls
  • 180 minutes covers a large pool without a mid-cycle recharge
  • Charging dock, so no lifting it out between runs

What doesn't

  • A 2026 model with a short public track record — owner reports are thin
  • The listed discount is deep, which means the undiscounted price is not the price to judge it on
  • Inground only

Who should skip this

Skip this one if you want a model with several seasons of owner feedback behind it, or your pool is above-ground.

Questions people actually ask

What size pool is the Hayward TigerShark QC for?

Hayward publishes inground pools up to 20 x 40 ft for this model.

What is the Quick Clean cycle on the TigerShark?

A short cycle for a fast pass rather than the full-length clean — useful before guests arrive, and genuinely the feature owners use most.

Is the Hayward TigerShark QC worth $1,489?

Only if you want Hayward dealer service for everything on your pad. On capability per dollar, machines at half the price publish better specifications.

Are TigerShark filters cheap?

Yes — aftermarket RCX70101 cartridges are about $21 for four, which is competitive with Dolphin and far cheaper than Beatbot.

Where these facts come from